![]() I am sure people such as yourself think that Kylo Ren is just batshit crazy and was just talking to Vader’s melted helmet like Osborne talked tot he green Goblin’s mask in Spider-man.He couldn’t possibly have been talking to Snoke/plagueis or anything…When he says” I am going to fulfill our destiny and finish what you started” as they show Vader’s helmet at that exact moment, it could not possibly mean that Snoke/Plagueis’s plan Started with Vader and the virgin birth. Yep, they are just going to ignore the fact that everything was all Plagueis’s plan all along.and just lead people to believe that it was all Palpatines grand scheme the whole time and pretend he never existed and was never mentioned ever…even though the trailer pretty much confirms the whole Plagueis theory. People just have their own ideas regarding what would make a compelling story. “People really just want to make it more complicated than it actually is.” – No. Maybe he’s actually speaking with Plagueis and referencing Plagueis’s plans that were aborted when Sidious intervened and stole the show for a few decades… He states, “I will finish what you have started.” Because we’re looking at the remains of Vader’s mask when we hear that, it’s easy to assume he speaking to Vader. One thought kicking around in my head was of who Kylo Ren was addressing in the trailer. But I’m not totally sold.īut again, it’s not that I don’t like the idea. Certainly the temptation, and maybe even evidence, is there to draw that conclusion. Palpatine mentions that Plagueis had the ability to manipulate midichlorians to create life, but we really have no inherent reason to trust anything he says. The Jedi sort of float the idea that Anakin may have been conceived by the midichlorians. But it’s hardly a foregone conclusion that that’s how things went down. Nor am I saying that it would necessarily be a bad idea. Stay tuned to Entertainment Weekly for their last piece later today about “Why is Luke Skywalker missing?” I think it’d be fair to say that he is aware of the past to a great degree.” “He’s aware of what’s gone on, in the respect that he has been around and is aware of prior events. It is very much a newly-introduced character,” Serkis says. “No, he’s a new character in this universe. If Snoke is a “damaged” character, that raises the question: Did his wounds come from the clash between the Rebellion and the Empire, seen in the original Star Wars trilogy? Serkis hesitates here, but then says he believes Snoke was outside of that conflict. Without giving too much away at this point, he has a very distinctive, idiosyncratic bone structure and facial structure. And also just the facial design – you couldn’t have gotten there with prosthetics. “The scale of him, for instance, is one reason. While Abrams has emphasized a return to practical effects on The Force Awakens, is Snoke perhaps a character who could have been played by Serkis in make-up? As I said, there is a strange vulnerability to him, which belies his true agenda, I suppose.” “Supreme Leader Snoke is quite an enigmatic character, and strangely vulnerable at the same time as being quite powerful,” Serkis says. (So any “early concept art” that may be floating around online is probably nowhere near what this dark-hearted character looks like.) Snoke kept changing, not only through principle photography, but even after. In their second exclusive story for the day, Entertainment Weekly speak with Andy Serkis about his villainous character Snoke in Star Wars: The Force Awakens, revealing many interesting and new details…Įach character is always a collaborative process with the filmmakers and visual effects artists, but in the case of Snoke, the character’s look, voice, and movements evolved based on how far Serkis and director and co-writer J.J. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |